A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Sinovac and BioNTech Vaccine

Which is the best vaccine available in Hong Kong? We look at both options and score them according to different criteria. All scores are given out of a maximum of 10 for each criterion with a maximum score of 80 overall.

  • Effectiveness on Individual Basis
  • Population Effectiveness
  • Side Effects
  • Effectiveness Against Variants
  • Generating an Antibody Response
  • Cost of Vaccination
  • Ease of Manufacture, Storage and Distribution
  • Need for Booster Doses

 

Effectiveness on Individual Basis

We have a large number of studies internationally. Both vaccines are very effective in preventing death and serious disease. We have better evidence for BioNTech in preventing milder disease and transmission. This means on an individual basis both are very effective. BioNTech has consistently been shown to be the most effective both in studies and in large populations.

Sinovac: 6/10
BioNTech: 9/10

 

Population Effectiveness (Reaching Herd Immunity)

We have explained in a previous article that it is highly unlikely any countries will be able to reach Herd Immunity by vaccination alone. In population terms any immunity is good, but if we cannot reach herd immunity just with vaccinations, it is especially important that we vaccinate the old and the vulnerable in order to ensure they have individual protection. In population terms, the more effective a vaccine is in reducing mild disease and transmission, the better for the group. In this regard, BioNTech is a better vaccine.

Sinovac: 5/10
BioNTech: 9/10

 

Side Effects

Serious side effects are very rare with both vaccines. Mild side effects are more common with BioNTech. We have discussed the side effects of Covid vaccines in a previous article, mild side effects are not always a bad thing. Often this is a sign of the development of effective immunity.

Sinovac: 9/10
BioNTech: 8/10

 

Effectiveness Against Variants

Variants reduce the effectiveness of vaccinations. We have better evidence for sustained effectiveness for BioNTech. Against the original virus BioNTech was 95% effective compared to 50.7% for Sinovac. BioNTech drops to 88% against Delta. We have less scientific evidence for Sinovac against new variants, but population studies suggest it to be less effective.

Sinovac: 5/10
BioNTech: 9/10

 

Generating an Antibody Response

Both vaccinations produce an effective immune response. We know from recent studies from The University of Hong Kong University that BioNTech produces a 10x greater antibody response than Sinovac. Other studies internationally have now shown waning of antibodies with killed vaccines (such as Sinovac) more quickly.

Sinovac: 5/10
BioNTech: 9/10

 

Cost of Vaccination

BioNTech is a new technology and is currently significantly more expensive. Both vaccines have been made available through Covax although internationally the cost makes Sinovac a significantly more accessible option.

Sinovac 9/10
BioNTech 6/10

 

Ease of Manufacture, Storage and Distribution

As a new technology, the manufacture and distribution of BioNTech are significantly more difficult. This contributes to the expense. It must be stored at extremely low temperatures. Recently, we have increasing evidence that it can be stored for longer after being reconstituted. This will make delivery in medical clinics and family health centres easier in the future. Sinovac can be stored in a standard fridge. Manufacture, distribution and storage are easier for killed vaccines such as Sinovac.

Sinovac 9/10
BioNTech 7/10

 

Need for Booster Doses

We have discussed booster doses in another article. We do not yet have enough evidence as to when booster doses will be required. One potential advantage of the mRNA vaccines, such as BioNTech, is that they can be re-engineered against the new variants. It seems likely that BioNTech will last longer than Sinovac. It is quite likely that Sinovac vaccinations will, in the future, be boosted by BioNTech or an alternative second-generation vaccine.

Sinovac 6/10
BioNTech 9/10

 

Final Verdict

  Sinovac BioNTech
Effectiveness on Individual Basis 6 9
Population Effectiveness 5 9
Side Effects 9 8
Effectiveness Against Variants 5 9
Generating an Antibody Response 5 9
Cost of Vaccination 9 6
Ease of Manufacture, Storage and Distribution 9 7
Need for Booster Doses 6 9
Final Score 54/80 66/80

Both vaccines are very good at stopping individuals from becoming seriously ill or dying. For individuals both vaccinations are excellent. Sinovac has the advantage of being a more traditional vaccine which is easier to make, cheaper and as such is it easier to distribute to larger populations. It also has less, mild side effects. BioNTech is more expensive, logistically more difficult to distribute and has more mild side effects. However, it is more effective on an individual level in reducing total disease and transmission. In population terms, this makes it a much better vaccine. It is also more effective against variants. From an individual perspective, both vaccines will be very good. From the perspective of the population, we need as many people as possible, especially those who are older or more vulnerable, to be vaccinated with the most effective vaccine to give us the greatest chance of reaching Herd Immunity with minimal damage from infections. In this regard, considering Hong Kong has excellent logistics and a free vaccination program, BioNTech is the better vaccine and we should be encouraging as many people as possible to be vaccinated with this vaccination.

Topics: COVID-19

OT&P Healthcare

OT&P Healthcare

OT&P Healthcare is a Premium Private Healthcare Practice in Hong Kong. Our priority is to help individuals to enhance and optimise their health by providing easy access to a wide range of excellent practitioners and information, supported by management systems and technology that ensure quality of service and value. Our Mission is to provide pre-eminent private healthcare in Hong Kong. We aim to be the best in class fully integrated healthcare service, providing a circle of care for all our patients' needs.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement